| Money and other Crises |
|
|
|
|
C h a l l e n g e s O f O u r T i m e
Currently the world, as I observe it in my day to day life, seems
to be quiet, predictable and stable. In my whole life time there
exists no memory of any bigger crisis and I tend to take it for
granted that the world will continue to work the same way into the far
future. All of my friends and in general all of the people I know
seem to live in the same belief.
Nevertheless if I start to think and when I start to set known
facts into relation with eachother I come to the conclusion that
it is quite possible that we will soon have to face severe crises
that have the potential to change the life as we know it.
This web-site should serve as a single big question: How do you
judge these matters? I would like to hear your opinion. I
would like to know if my reasoning has any big holes that I did
not consider. I would be grateful if you would contact me to shed
some light on these matters from your point of view.
Currently I see the following big challenges that our generation
will have to face (in no specific order):
I never experienced any bank breakdowns in my whole lifetime and I assume my money and my security papers to be safe in the banks. In addition several of the security papers I hold are from a legal point of view a "debenture bond" of the issuing bank house. I believe that nearly nobody includes in his calculations the risk of losing either his savings or his money that he invested in the stock market, because of a bank going bankrupt. The lessons of the big depresson of 1929 are too far away to still play a role in the memory of the current generation. I do not know how much time we still have until we will experience the first effects of the upcoming crisis, but I advocate to act quickly and to take action to prepare our societies for the upcoming problems. I see this case similar to somebody investing in an insurance. It costs some extra money to pay the monthly installments, but in the case that you really need the insurance it is worth every penny. In the case that you do not need the insurance: even better! In my opinion the highest priority should be to enable people to solve their problems decentralized and on a local scale. We should train people in their capacity to act independently from a global central government and we should train them to use their brains themselves. I believe that a nation of active, capable and critically thinking people will go through a possible crisis much easier than a horde of lemmings. Independent of which political group you belong to our common goal should be to invest in human capacities of low tech problem solving. Facing the severity of the upcoming problems we cannot afford to end up in a situation where we as a civilization lose the capacity to act coordinated, ordered and peacefully. Another issue that we should attack quickly is to reform the "science" of national economy. Recently I've started to read several books in that direction and I am shocked by the style of hand waving qualitative arguments that economists use to "prove" their point. I believe economics on the scale of nations is a very complex system with a lot of cross depencencies, feed-back loops and other complicating matters. In my opinion the only way to make a sound and solid science out of this discipline is to introduce the experiment as the only mechanism to discover "truth". This will be expensive, but though are physics experiments, too! As long as national economy is a club of debating philosophers the quote of John Kenneth Galbraith that "In any great organization it is far, far safer to be wrong with the majority than to be right alone." will hold true and the masses who are wrong will be rewarded and the one who is right will be punished. As soon as the experiment is the decisive measure of "truth" courage will be rewarded and active thinking will start from scratch. |
|
|
M o n e y
This document is a single big question: is my understanding of the
core nature of the subject money correct or did I miss some
important aspects? If you disagree with my interpretations then I
would be very happy to hear your arguments. This document should serve
as a working basis for people who are interested in this subject and
who would like to participate in creating a sound and understandable
explanation of basic questions. |
|
|
S c a r c i t y O f F o s s i l e F u l e s
|
|
|
U n e m p l o y m e n t
|
|
|
D e m o c r a c y
|
|
|
P r o j e c t B l u e P r i n t
|
|
|
Last modified: Wed Aug 29 13:39:19 CEST 2007
|
|